{"id":104063,"date":"2024-01-31T12:03:52","date_gmt":"2024-01-31T12:03:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/trump-can-stay-on-illinois-2024-ballot-after-14th-amendment-challenge-officials-say\/"},"modified":"2024-01-31T12:03:52","modified_gmt":"2024-01-31T12:03:52","slug":"trump-can-stay-on-illinois-2024-ballot-after-14th-amendment-challenge-officials-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/trump-can-stay-on-illinois-2024-ballot-after-14th-amendment-challenge-officials-say\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump can stay on Illinois 2024 ballot after 14th Amendment challenge, officials say"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2024\/01\/GETTYRF_81222_VotePin252028929.jpg\" alt=\"\"><figcaption>Marilyn Nieves\/Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>(WASHINGTON) &#8212; Donald Trump can remain on Illinois\u2019 presidential primary ballot, the State Board of Elections voted on Tuesday, dismissing another challenge to the former president&#8217;s eligibility under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the insurrection clause.<\/p>\n<p>The eight-person, bipartisan board voted unanimously against a lawsuit brought by a group of Illinois voters represented by national group Free Speech for the People and Illinois elections lawyers.<\/p>\n<p>The body said it lacked the authority to decide on the challenge, which cited Trump&#8217;s push to overturn his 2020 election loss and accused him of inciting the Jan. 6 attack at the U.S. Capitol where Congress was gathered to certify Joe Biden as the next president.<\/p>\n<p>Trump denies all wrongdoing and has previously attacked the 14th Amendment cases as anti-democratic.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cTrump did not engage in insurrection, as that term is used in the Constitution,&#8221; Trump&#8217;s attorney Adam Merrill said on Tuesday. &#8220;It is a complicated legal term that has been rarely interpreted and it wasn&#8217;t even articulated correctly by the hearing officer in this case and, frankly, never should have reached it because of the lack of evidence, and because of the lack of jurisdiction.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Illinois board considered the eligibility challenge for roughly an hour before unanimously affirming Trump\u2019s candidacy.<\/p>\n<p>Free Speech for the People said they will appeal and expect that, under review, the courts would show &#8220;why Illinois law authorizes that ruling despite Trump\u2019s subjective belief that the Constitution doesn\u2019t apply to him.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In his own statement, on social media, Trump celebrated the board&#8217;s ruling and said it was &#8220;protecting the Citizens of our Country from the Radical Left Lunatics who are trying to destroy it.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The decision comes just over a week before the U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to hear oral arguments on Feb. 8 on a similar 14th Amendment challenge to Trump out of Colorado, after that state&#8217;s top court ruled the former president ineligible for their primary ballot under Section 3.<\/p>\n<p>Dozens of 14th Amendment challenges to Trump&#8217;s eligibility have been considered by courts, election boards or secretaries of state over the past year.<\/p>\n<p>Only the Colorado Supreme Court and Maine&#8217;s secretary of state have ruled Trump ineligible to participate in their primary process.<\/p>\n<p>The case in Maine is set for reconsideration by Secretary Shenna Bellows after the U.S. Supreme Court decides on the Colorado case.<\/p>\n<p>The Illinois board on Tuesday upheld the recommendation of hearing officer Clark Erickson, who oversaw a two-hour administrative hearing for the case on Friday and suggested the body rule that Trump engaged in insurrection within the meaning of Section 3 but should still not have his name removed from the state\u2019s 2024 primary ballot.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I want it to be clear that this Republican believes that there was an insurrection on Jan. 6. There&#8217;s no doubt in my mind that he manipulated, instigated, aided and abetted an insurrection on Jan. 6,\u201d board member Catherine S. McCrory, a Republican, said on Tuesday.<\/p>\n<p>Erickson, a Republican retired state judge, wrote last week that the Illinois State Board of Elections should reject the case against Trump because their body \u201cisn\u2019t suited\u201d to rule on this issue &#8212; that a decision on the challenge instead belongs to the courts.<\/p>\n<p>He also noted the difficulty of considering such a &#8220;sophisticated&#8221; case ahead of the state&#8217;s fast-approaching March 19 primary.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In the context of the events and circumstances of January 6, 2024,&#8221; Erickson recommended the board favor the Illinois voters&#8217; argument that Trump engaged in insurrection &#8220;on the merits by a preponderance of the evidence.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>He then concluded: \u201cThe Election Code is simply not suited for issues involving constitutional analysis. Those issues belong in the Courts.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;All in all, attempting to resolve a constitutional issue within the expedited schedule of an election board hearing is somewhat akin to scheduling a two-minute round between heavyweight boxers in a telephone booth,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 2024, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Marilyn Nieves\/Getty Images (WASHINGTON) &#8212; Donald Trump can remain on Illinois\u2019 presidential primary ballot, the State Board of Elections voted on Tuesday, dismissing another challenge to the former president&#8217;s eligibility under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, also known as the insurrection clause. The eight-person, bipartisan board voted unanimously against<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/trump-can-stay-on-illinois-2024-ballot-after-14th-amendment-challenge-officials-say\/\">Read More &rarr;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[156,31,2],"tags":[273,271,276,274,270,123,275,133,124,272,102,103],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104063"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=104063"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/104063\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=104063"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=104063"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=104063"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}