{"id":108558,"date":"2025-01-17T18:03:35","date_gmt":"2025-01-17T18:03:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/tiktok-ban-upheld-by-supreme-court-days-before-law-takes-effect\/"},"modified":"2025-01-17T18:03:35","modified_gmt":"2025-01-17T18:03:35","slug":"tiktok-ban-upheld-by-supreme-court-days-before-law-takes-effect","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/tiktok-ban-upheld-by-supreme-court-days-before-law-takes-effect\/","title":{"rendered":"TikTok ban upheld by Supreme Court days before law takes effect"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>\n<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/s3.amazonaws.com\/syndication.abcaudio.com\/files\/2025-01-17\/Getty_TikTok_011725.jpg\" alt><figcaption>Jaap Arriens\/NurPhoto via Getty Images<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>(WASHINGTON) &#8212; The Supreme Court on Friday\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Business\/tiktok-avoid-ban-experts\/story?id=117694328\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">upheld a law set to ban<\/a>\u00a0social media platform TikTok in less than 48 hours.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community,&#8221; the ruling states. &#8220;But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok&#8217;s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>It continues, &#8220;For the foregoing Per Curiam reasons, we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners&#8217; First Amendment rights. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is affirmed.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The court&#8217;s ruling was unanimous, with liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor and conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch writing concurring opinions.<\/p>\n<p>In an apparent effort to limit the implications of its ruling, the court said its judgment should not be interpreted as a rebuke of common practices taken up by social media companies, such as data collection.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We emphasize the inherent narrowness of our holding,&#8221; the unsigned ruling says. &#8220;Data collection and analysis is a common practice in this digital age. But TikTok&#8217;s scale and susceptibility to foreign adversary control, together with the vast swaths of sensitive data the platform collects, justify differential treatment to address the Government&#8217;s national security concerns.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Unless TikTok severs ties with China-based parent company ByteDance, the ban will take effect on Sunday, the day before President-elect Donald Trump assumes office.<\/p>\n<p>The Biden administration on Friday said it\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/biden-administration-leave-trump-implement-tiktok-ban\/story?id=117753133\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">would not enforce the potential ban<\/a>\u00a0in the immediate aftermath of the deadline, leaving implementation of the law to Trump.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;TikTok should remain available to Americans, but simply under American ownership or other ownership that addresses the national security concerns identified by Congress in developing this law,&#8221; White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said after the ruling.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Given the sheer fact of timing, this Administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next Administration, which takes office on Monday,&#8221; Jean-Pierre added.<\/p>\n<p>Attorney General Merrick Garland said in a statement, &#8220;The Court&#8217;s decision enables the Justice Department to prevent the Chinese government from weaponizing TikTok to undermine America&#8217;s national security. Authoritarian regimes should not have unfettered access to millions of Americans&#8217; sensitive data. The Court&#8217;s decision affirms that this Act protects the national security of the United States in a manner that is consistent with the Constitution.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Trump, who opposed the ban, has said he will seek to reverse it. TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew will attend Trump&#8217;s inauguration after receiving an invitation from the incoming administration.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Supreme Court decision was expected, and everyone must respect it,&#8221; Trump wrote on Truth Social. &#8220;My decision on TikTok will be made in the not too distant future, but I must have time to review the situation. Stay tuned!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Trump\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/abcnews.go.com\/Politics\/trump-speaks-chinas-xi-jinping-days-inauguration\/story?id=117787219\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">said he had spoken<\/a>\u00a0to Chinese President Xi Jinping on Friday morning with TikTok being one of the topics they discussed, according to a Truth Social post.<\/p>\n<p>TikTok &#8212; which boasts more than 170 million U.S. users &#8212; challenged the sale-or-ban law on First Amendment grounds, arguing that a potential ban would limit the free-expression rights of its users.<\/p>\n<p>Lower courts, however, found merit in security concerns about potential data collection or content manipulation undertaken by the Chinese government.<\/p>\n<p>Even after the ban takes effect, TikTok could remain available for U.S. users.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than force TikTok to take the app dark, the law targets third-party companies like cloud-service providers and app stores. TikTok could circumvent such restrictions, at least temporarily, though experts say the quality of the app would degrade over time.<\/p>\n<p>Copyright \u00a9 2025, ABC Audio. All rights reserved.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jaap Arriens\/NurPhoto via Getty Images (WASHINGTON) &#8212; The Supreme Court on Friday\u00a0upheld a law set to ban\u00a0social media platform TikTok in less than 48 hours. &#8220;There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source<span class=\"more-link\"><a href=\"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/tiktok-ban-upheld-by-supreme-court-days-before-law-takes-effect\/\">Read More &rarr;<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[156,31,2],"tags":[273,271,276,274,270,123,275,133,124,272,102,103],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108558"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108558"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108558\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108558"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108558"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lascrucestoday.com\/newstalklc\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108558"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}